Comments on: Future plans and TODOs of LXDE in 2010 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585 blog.lxde.org Mon, 13 May 2013 15:31:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ikem http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-2015 Ikem Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:58:40 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-2015 I like the idea of the control center. But I think it should be a seperate tool and optional, like the rest of the desktop environment. I like the idea of the control center. But I think it should be a seperate tool and optional, like the rest of the desktop environment.

]]> By: Gusar http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1997 Gusar Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:44:19 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1997 @anonymous: Yes, gvfs is modular. But if you read the blog post, PCMan intends to have gnome-disk-utility handle mounting in PCManFM. And well, gnome-disk-utility brings in gnome dependencies, specifically gnome-keyring and gconf. I don't like this either, I would prefer for PCManFM to talk directly to udisks. @PCMan: Udisks *is* Devicekit-disks. It's the exact same thing, just a new name. @anonymous: Yes, gvfs is modular. But if you read the blog post, PCMan intends to have gnome-disk-utility handle mounting in PCManFM. And well, gnome-disk-utility brings in gnome dependencies, specifically gnome-keyring and gconf. I don’t like this either, I would prefer for PCManFM to talk directly to udisks.

@PCMan: Udisks *is* Devicekit-disks. It’s the exact same thing, just a new name.

]]> By: sisko http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1988 sisko Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:33:05 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1988 Perhaps LXDE could develop/use something like KDE4's solid? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_(KDE) http://solid.kde.org/ Perhaps LXDE could develop/use something like KDE4’s solid?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_(KDE)
http://solid.kde.org/

]]> By: anonymous http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1985 anonymous Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:24:35 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1985 @mihaim: If Arch introduces needless dependencies to GVFS, then that is an Arch problem, not a GVFS problem. GVFS compiles and runs here just fine *without* gconf and other Gnome stuff. Out of the box. @mihaim: If Arch introduces needless dependencies to GVFS, then that is an Arch problem, not a GVFS problem. GVFS compiles and runs here just fine *without* gconf and other Gnome stuff. Out of the box.

]]> By: mihaim http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1984 mihaim Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:52:19 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1984 @anonymous: it depends on many GNOME packages. At least on Arch, these are gnome-disk-utility, gnome-keyring, libsoup-gnome and, most importantly: _gconf_. I have an gconf-free system, and I intend to keep it like that, I disagree with its way and I don't want my desktop to depend on it. Pure and simple. @tiik: please ask in the Arch forums, there are some automatic tools to build live-cd's. Archers are usually not interested in such things, though, because it is a modular system (actually like LXDE) and no one trusts "standard" selections. @pcman: after reading your announcement, I decided to move over from XFCE to LXDE. I always liked your principles but I had the feeling that this project is a bit abandoned. I'm loving it and I hope I'll help in the future, thanks for your work! @anonymous: it depends on many GNOME packages. At least on Arch, these are gnome-disk-utility, gnome-keyring, libsoup-gnome and, most importantly: _gconf_. I have an gconf-free system, and I intend to keep it like that, I disagree with its way and I don’t want my desktop to depend on it. Pure and simple.

@tiik: please ask in the Arch forums, there are some automatic tools to build live-cd’s. Archers are usually not interested in such things, though, because it is a modular system (actually like LXDE) and no one trusts “standard” selections.

@pcman: after reading your announcement, I decided to move over from XFCE to LXDE. I always liked your principles but I had the feeling that this project is a bit abandoned. I’m loving it and I hope I’ll help in the future, thanks for your work!

]]> By: Planes para LXDE en 2010 « Arcalinux http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1982 Planes para LXDE en 2010 « Arcalinux Sat, 09 Jan 2010 05:43:09 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1982 [...] Fuente [...] [...] Fuente [...]

]]> By: nicholas http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1981 nicholas Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:56:19 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1981 I glad support this project and developed in parts things. I glad support this project and developed in parts things.

]]> By: tiik http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1979 tiik Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:17:35 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1979 I really want to test arch+lxde on iso. can you provide "arch+lxde live cd"? I really want to test arch+lxde on iso.
can you provide “arch+lxde live cd”?

]]> By: anonymous http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585&cpage=1#comment-1975 anonymous Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:02:10 +0000 http://blog.lxde.org/?p=585#comment-1975 > Lightweight gvfs fork: > 1. GVFS will bring many dependencies, but > since it’s free software, we can fork it and > remove some gnome dependencies. Why do you insist that GVFS has many Gnome dependencies? The only required dependencies are D-Bus and GLib. See comment #4 here: http://blog.lxde.org/?p=541#comments > Lightweight gvfs fork:
> 1. GVFS will bring many dependencies, but
> since it’s free software, we can fork it and
> remove some gnome dependencies.

Why do you insist that GVFS has many Gnome dependencies? The only required dependencies are D-Bus and GLib. See comment #4 here:

http://blog.lxde.org/?p=541#comments

]]>